The verdicts, where you book

FlightWifi adds one honest chip to every flight result: video calls work, email and browsing, varies by aircraft, or no Wi-Fi. Matched to the exact aircraft, sourced from official pages, computed entirely in your browser.

Add to Chrome, free235 airlines · zero permissions · no tracking
FlightWifi verdict chips on Google Flights results

What it checks that airlines won't tell you

Exact aircraft, not fleet averages

A mid-rollout airline gets a per-plane answer, because that is how retrofits actually happen.

Call policy included

Fast wifi where the airline bans calls says so: Fast, but no calls.

Trips roll up honestly

A two-leg trip where one leg has nothing says Not on every aircraft, not a cheerful average.

Sources one hover away

Every verdict's tooltip names the system, the rollout state and the official sources behind it.

Verdicts it shows

Video calls workFast, but no callsEmail & browsingVaries by aircraftNot on every aircraftNo Wi-FiNot verified

The label system is deliberate: the first words name what varies, and no chip ever promises more than the sources support. When we don't know, it says so.

Extension questions

Is it free?

Yes, completely. No account, no tier, no trial.

What does it collect about me?

Nothing. The extension requests zero API permissions, makes no network requests of its own, and has no server. All matching happens locally against a registry bundled in the package.

Which sites does it work on?

Google Flights (results, expanded cards and the booking page), Skyscanner, and soar.flights. The verdict follows the exact aircraft wherever the page names it.

Why do some flights say Varies by aircraft?

Because that is the truth: on mid-retrofit fleets like United or Emirates, some planes of the same type carry the fast system and some carry the old one, and the schedule does not say which tail you will get.

Privacy in one line: the extension collects nothing, sends nothing, and has no server. Read the full privacy policy, or the source on GitHub.